By The Numbers: Steve Buscemi

Yeah, yeah he's a movie star. We'll talk about that more in a minute. As I was going through his lengthy credits I passed by Pete and Pete. Anyone remember that show? Kid's show with two brothers, both named Pete. Only had, I think, 3 seasons, but I used to love that show. I forgot Buscemi did a couple episodes.

Alright, an explanation of how this all works for anyone new.

I take all the films an actor or actress has been in and break them down into three categories, 'Good' 'Bad' and 'Ok.' I do not count TV appearances or Made for TV movies. Afterwards a quick analysis will show whether or not they're a good actor by the numbers. Invariably there is a 2-3 +/- point bias on a person to person basis. Also, since 'ok' movies are not bad they count towards the positive column in the overall figuring. If by the numbers they fall in the 50 - 60% range, they're a bad actor; 61 - 70% good actor, and 71 - 80% great actor. Anything higher is unlikely, but will be classified as "elite."

Now let's see those numbers:

I know a lot of you who read my blog are Buscemi fans. I am too. That said he barely limps into the good column. When I began on the list I was sure it would be an easy win. But I forgot how many horrible kids movies and bad Adam Sandler films he's been in, not to mention his early career was littered with duds. This one is so tight that a single movie the other way and he'd register poorly. Nevertheless with a total of 61% positive over 39% negative, Steve Buscemi is officially a good actor. He's got some great looking films coming up so let's hope he stays on the good path. 

Thanks to Ally for choosing this week's pick!